Amazing Voice: Lena Chamamyan

Of all the musical instruments I find the human voice to be the most fascinating one.
No other instrument comes even close to the range of expressions that the human voice can produce.

When an artist isn’t just blessed with a great voice but when the artist knows how to use it, then something truly exceptional is created.
Lena Chamamyan, a Syrian-Armenian singer, is such an artist. Enjoy!

THE ACCURACY OF HOSPITALIZATION DATA AND THE “WISDOM” OF MAKING OTHER PEOPLE COPY ME

Tom approaches the wuhan virus in a very rational way and uses common sense, two qualities that are in short supply these days when it comes to the wuhan virus. He also cites a most welcome “random act of journalism” manifested in an article by the “The Atlantic”.

The only thing missing from the article is a consideration of the potential impact of fraud which could skew the numbers.

An OIG report of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services from February 2021 indicates rampant upcoding for the fiscal year 2019.

Upcoding is a type of fraud in the healthcare system which involves the use of a false secondary diagnosis or the fraudulent swapping of main diagnosis and secondary diagnosis.
For a good and simple explanation see https://www.hallrender.com/2021/03/01/hospitals-beware-new-oig-report-suggests-rampant-inpatient-upcoding/

It would be extremely naive not to consider the possible impact of upcoding, especially if the diagnosis Covid-19 is a lucrative one.

Prince William-Manassas Family Alliance

Illustration of the morphology of coronaviruses; the club-shaped viral spike peplomers, coloured red, create the look of a corona surrounding the virion, when viewed electron microscopically (from here (en.wikipedia.org))

What is one of the big headaches with the COVID-19 pandemic? Most of the news media is constantly trying to scare us with fear porn. Occasionally, however, we see something increasingly rare, a story in the news media that is actually informative. Here is an excerpt from one such story.

If you want to make sense of the number of COVID hospitalizations at any given time, you need to know how sick each patient actually is. Until now, that’s been almost impossible to suss out. The federal government requires hospitals to report every patient who tests positive for COVID, yet the overall tallies of COVID hospitalizations, made available on various state and federal dashboards and widely reported on by the media…

View original post 688 more words

Revelation

It feels like we’re living in biblical times. It’s as if a spirit of darkness and oppression has settled over the world. While millions, if not billions, are forced to hide their faces behind veils others are dropping their masks, revealing the darkness in their hearts. Those who reveal the darkness of their hearts are often members of the medical profession, a profession we like to think of as noble and ethical but in truth it is no more noble than your average person. Don’ get me wrong. There are many wonderful doctors and nurses out there but all doctors and nurses are still humans and subject to the same temptations and lusts that we all are.

The medical profession, since antiquity, has adopted an ethical code which was articulated by Hippocrates of Kos, the founder of modern medicine. This ethical code was supposed to keep the less noble aspects of human nature in check. This ethical code is written down in the “Oath of Hippocrates” which doctors in many countries have to swear upon entry into their careers as doctors.
After the monstrous medical atrocities of the 3rd Reich in 1948 the World Medical Association (WMA) adopted the “Geneva Declaration” which was supposed to be a modernized version of the Hippocratic Oath.
This declaration has no more references to gods.

These days members of the medical profession are shamelessly and openly violating both the Hippocratic Oath and the secular, humanistic Geneva Declaration when they declare that they won’t treat unvaccinated people and when Frank Ulrich Montgomery, Chair of the Council of the same WMA that adopted the Geneva Declaration, supports forced vaccination and calls for new rules that would forbid unvaccinated persons to go to places like coffee shops and restaurants and other public places in Germany.
Montgomery, this sick bastard, calls for even more draconian rules than the ones imposed on the French. Under his “2G” rules only the vaccinated and those who had already have covid would be allowed to visit places like restaurants and you wouldn’t be able to go to the restaurants even if you would test negative.
This sick bastard violates the Hippocratic principle “first, do no harm.” and the declaration that his own organisation adopted.

So, when Julie, a fabulous blogger, wrote in one of her posts “we have moved into a post Christian society”, I was thinking that we have become not just a post Christian society. We have become worse. We have become a post pagan and even a post humanistic society.

We have seen in recent years the unmasking of many institutions. The journalists, for example, dropped the mask, the pretence of objectivity, and proudly revealed their blatandly partisan nature.
This spirit that has settled over the world is causing many to reveal their ugly natures and their black hearts. What has been hidden behind the mask is now revealed in the open.
The good thing about all this that we now can see our enemies. They are not hiding anymore.
Whether it’s these medical fascists or those who view mankind as a virus and a cancer on the earth that needs to be eradicated, they are our enemies because they hate humanity.

The 2017 version of the Geneva Declaration:

“AS A MEMBER OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION:

I SOLEMNLY PLEDGE to dedicate my life to the service of humanity;
THE HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF MY PATIENT will be my first consideration;
I WILL RESPECT the autonomy and dignity of my patient;
I WILL MAINTAIN the utmost respect for human life;
I WILL NOT PERMIT considerations of age, disease or disability, creed, ethnic origin, gender, nationality, political affiliation, race, sexual orientation, social standing or any other factor to intervene between my duty and my patient;
I WILL RESPECT the secrets that are confided in me, even after the patient has died;
I WILL PRACTICE my profession with conscience and dignity and in accordance with good medical practice;
I WILL FOSTER the honour and noble traditions of the medical profession;
I WILL GIVE to my teachers, colleagues, and students the respect and gratitude that is their due;
I WILL SHARE my medical knowledge for the benefit of the patient and the advancement of healthcare;
I WILL ATTEND TO my own health, well-being, and abilities in order to provide care of the highest standard;
I WILL NOT USE my medical knowledge to violate human rights and civil liberties, even under threat;
I MAKE THESE PROMISES solemnly, freely and upon my honour.”

The Hippocratic Oath:

“I swear by Apollo the physician, and Aesculapius the surgeon, likewise Hygeia and Panacea, and call all the gods and goddesses to witness, that I will observe and keep this underwritten oath, to the utmost of my power and judgment.

I will reverence my master who taught me the art. Equally with my parents, will I allow him things necessary for his support, and will consider his sons as brothers.
I will teach them my art without reward or agreement; and I will impart all my acquirement, instructions, and whatever I know, to my master’s children, as to my own; and likewise to all my pupils, who shall bind and tie themselves by a professional oath, but to none else.

With regard to healing the sick, I will devise and order for them the best diet, according to my judgment and means; and I will take care that they suffer no hurt or damage. Nor shall any man’s entreaty prevail upon me to administer poison to anyone; neither will I counsel any man to do so. Moreover, I will give no sort of medicine to any pregnant woman, with a view to destroy the child.

Further, I will comport myself and use my knowledge in a godly manner.
I will not cut for the stone, but will commit that affair entirely to the surgeons.
Whatsoever house I may enter, my visit shall be for the convenience and advantage of the patient; and I will willingly refrain from doing any injury or wrong from falsehood, and (in an especial manner) from acts of an amorous nature, whatever may be the rank of those who it may be my duty to cure, whether mistress or servant, bond or free.

Whatever, in the course of my practice, I may see or hear (even when not invited), whatever I may happen to obtain knowledge of, if it be not proper to repeat it, I will keep sacred and secret within my own breast.

If I faithfully observe this oath, may I thrive and prosper in my fortune and profession, and live in the estimation of posterity; or on breach thereof, may the reverse be my fate!”

This Is Why Big Tech Censors You

By now there are many peer reviewed studies, showing the efficacy of treatments with ivermectin, hydroxychloraquin and other substances.
There is no solid empirical evidence that lockdowns and masks do more good than harm. Yet, those idiots advocating for such measures completely ignore their very severe negative side effects. They pretend that there are no such side effects or that it’s still worth having those measures imposed on all of us. The few studies that have been done could not show that masks or lockdowns have any substantial, positive effects.
From the beginning it was clear that the “vaccines” could not be the sole solution or even the main part of the solution for the problem.
The “vaccines” would not be effective enough and therefore too many viruses would escape. Vaccinating too many people, let alone all people would put too much pressure on the virus, resulting in escape mutants which would be resistant to the “vaccines”.
For this very reason, to prevent resistant strains of bacteria, you don’t give out antibiotics like lollypops.
From the beginning the virus was overhyped and everything was done to spread fear.

These and many other facts have been known for a long time.
Why, then, does Big Tech suppress every information that could result in ending the pandemic and why does Big Tech promote information that helps prolonging the wuhan virus crisis?

It’s not only ideology or goverment pressure that causes Big Tech to censor everything that challenges the official narrative with regards to the wuhan virus.
Big Tech has a very strong incentive to prolong the wuhan virus crisis.
It’s the money. As you can see in the graphics I have provided (data from https://www.macrotrends.net), since the start of the pandemic Big Tech has been making money like pirates.

While small businesses were nuked and millions lost their jobs Big Tech has made a veritable loot.
The closing of shops on a massive scale resulted in a huge increase in online shopping.
The widespread closing of offices resulted in a huge increase in home office work.
The closing of schools, restaurants, cultural institutions like museums, theaters and concerts as well as severe restrictions of gatherings of people, be it for church services or just for the usual communication between persons resulted in a huge increase in online communication via social media and other online platforms. After all, man is a social animal and can’t live without interpersonal communication.

All this has hugely benefitted Big Tech by enormously increasing demand for hardware, operating systems, all kinds of software, especially software for online conferences like Microsoft Teams, software services and software licenses, cloud and online services, server capacities and the whole cloud infrastracture like Amazon AWS and too many other things to mention.
I don’t know the numbers but you can rest assured that a huge increase in online activity has also resulted in an equally huge increase in advertising revenues for companies like Facebook.

Biden was right when he said about the social media: “They are killing people”.
He was right but not for the reasons he thinks. Through its censorship Big Tech is killing people by needlessly prolonging the pandemic and by keeping people away from effective treatments such as ivermectin which could save the lives of people who really need these treatments.

Graphics: Big Tech net income from 2014 to present,

Stupid Warriors

I wanted to write this post back in July I but didn’t find the time to do it.
The military and political debacle in Afghanistan which was caused by Joe Biden has given new motivation for writing it.
In a lengthy interview Admiral James Stavridis talks a lot about his book “2034: A Novel of the Next World War” which describes a military conflict between the US and China.
In the book China has technologically outstripped the US by 2034 and because of domestic politics and the mishandling of its alliances the US has not a single ally left, which looks like a shot at President Trump. That is understandable because at the time the book was written this was the easy and safe thing to do and I don’t blame the admiral for doing that.

However, I blame Stavridis for failing to acknowledge that the radical change in Biden’s half year in office makes the situation for the US military even worse than described in the book. Critical race theory, transgender soldiers and other woke projects in the military, accelerated destruction of the economy, inflation and policies directly favoring China, the increased deindustrialization of the US and the cutting of defense spending are all weakening the US military and they are changing the balance of power to China’s advantage.

There is one thing I have not seen discussed anywhere. It is the effect of America’s radical shift towards socialism on America’s alliances. Just like the rise of marxism accompanied with increased antisemitism, exemplified by people like Ilhan Omar, have a negative impact on America’s alliance with Israel, I believe, an America dominated by socialist ideas would negatively impact its alliances against China. Just like an America that would see Israel as an imperialistic oppressor would hardly be inclined to support Israel, why would an America that more and more resembles China want to support some militarily weak democracies in the pacific? Why would an America that shares the same ideology with China want to support the democracies in the indopacific region in their effort to thwart Chinese attempts at dominating the region?
If America was ideologically the same as China why would these democracies want to ally themselves with America? They might just as well join China.

Enter the wrecking ball Joe Biden.
If one wanted to severely damage America’s alliances with NATO countries like Britain, Germany and France and make new future alliances much more difficult or impossible to achieve, one could not do a better job than Biden.
Without notifying its NATO allies the US abandoned Bagram airbase thus making it much more difficult to evacuate their militaries and civilians.
As the Biden administration shamelessly abandoned its Afghan allies, who would want to ally themselves with the US?
Never mind that Biden abandoned America’s allies. He has thrown American citizens to the wolves.
Who in his right mind would trust this America?

In the end, Admiral Stavridis may be right that America has not one single ally left but it would be not because of some trumpian figure with isolationist impulses and a crude personality.
It would be because of a mean, cold and morally decrepit sociopath such as Biden.
Even so, the biggest irony would be that by the time America would have no more allies left, it would no longer need any allies against China because it would have become China.

Letter To My Employer

One of the bloggers I really like, is Tricia with her blog “Freedom Through Empowerment” (https://freedomthroughempowerment.wordpress.com/).
She is constantly and consistently writing against the mass psychosis that is induced and fueled by the world’s goverments (supposedly) in reaction to the wuhan virus.
This tells me that “Freedom Through Empowerment” is not just a slogan but that her fight for the cause of freedom stems from a burning desire for keeping and expanding our individual freedoms.
I share the same desire and I see in her a kindred spirit
She writes using rational thought, data, scientific evidence and, most importantly, critical thinking.
Not only talking the talk but walking the walk, she published a letter to her employer dealing with the company’s vaccination requirements. I agree wholeheartedly with her post and her letter.
The only thing I want to add is this: As true as “Freedom Through Empowerment” is “Empowerment Through Freedom” and it is by taking away our freedoms that certain persons and institutions seek to keep or increase their power. We cannot let it happen.

Freedom Through Empowerment

Like many of you, I’m starting to get pressure from my company to get the vaccine. They’ve not made it a requirement for employment yet, but you are expected to mask up while on company grounds if not vaccinated. I hate this, but as a remote employee it also doesn’t effect me much.

More recently they implemented a double vaccination requirement to attend our upcoming sales achievement bonus trip, which is an annual event that rewards sales people for achieving their quotas. I’ve always enjoyed these trips, as you get to mingle with colleagues who for most of the year you only communicate with virtually and everyone feels appreciated and rewarded for all their hard work.

I won’t be attending this year because I have not gotten the vaccine, nor do I plan to.

I know many of you are facing much more dire circumstances with these mandates and risk…

View original post 808 more words

Fortify Your Faith With Facts

Faith is important. Even the scientist needs faith. In fact, science requires BIG faith.
Science makes some BIG basic assumptions which science needs in order to operate.
However, these basic assumptions are UNPROVABLE.
Here are three of these unprovable assumptions that science is based upon:

  1. The universe is intelligible.
  2. We can trust our intelletual faculties to give us a true picture of reality.
  3. The laws of nature.do not change.

Assumption #3 is the backbone of science. If the laws of nature were changing over time we could for example not calculate the orbits of the planets for the next year.
Everytime we make such calculations for the future (or for the distant past) we have faith that the third assumption is true.

As important as faith is, facts that strengthen and justify faith are equally important.
This video provides fascinating and not widely known evidence that the gospels were based on eyewitness accounts.

Rules For Conservatives

A very popular series of jokes in the Soviet Union were the Radio Yerevan jokes.
They often made fun of the propaganda that was spread by the state media. Here are two examples:

Radio Yerevan was asked: “Is it true that the poet Vladimir Mayakovsky committed suicide?”
Radio Yerevan answered: “Yes, it is true, and even the record of his very last words is preserved: ´Don’t shoot, comrades.´”

Radio Yerevan was asked: “Is it true that conditions in our labor camps are excellent?”
Radio Yerevan answered: “In principle, yes. Five years ago one of our listeners was not convinced of this, so he was sent to investigate. He seems to have liked it so much that he hasn’t returned yet.”

In this post I will propose a strategy for defeating propaganda, and the jokes I cited point already to the weakness of propaganda and how it can be defeated but first, a little introduction.

There can be no denying that we are in a political war. It’s not a war we started. It was started by the Left after WWII when it realized that it could not overthrow Western democracies through violent revolution because of the West’s phenomenal economic success which created a broad middle class that had little appetite for revolution. For the first time, a large number of workers could enjoy a decent standard of living.

Having no hope of starting a successfull revolution, the marxists came up with the new strategy of “the march through the institutions” which was in essence the infiltration and subversion of all institutions, especially education and culture. Once successfully infiltrated, education and culture disseminated marxist ideas. Over time these ideas and radical world views spilled over into all kinds of institutions, especially the media.

Of the three institutions that the Left has conquered, education and culture have a long-lasting effect of influencing and shaping minds.
However, the media have a huge short-term effect that is so powerful that it can neutralize the influence of culture and education at any given time.
Why? Because, no matter what your beliefs are, the media can shape perception of reality in such a profound way that it can manipulate you to react in the way they want you to react. The restrictions of our liberties and the authoritarian behaviour of some politicians in these times of the wuhan virus pandemic were made only possible because of the fear, panic and misinformation that the media spread. No matter what your personal beliefs or political views are, we were all manipulated to a certain extent by the media propaganda.
Therefore, it is crucial, that we conquer the media or that we neutralize them.
One strategy is: Destroying the credibility of the “mainstream media”.

Those who, like me, grew up during the Cold War, were taught that our media in the West were not censored and that the media were not spreaders of propaganda.
Well, because this was to a certain extent true, the Western media could spread propaganda much more effectively than the media in communist/socialist countries.
Propaganda is most effective when it’s not perceived as such. Those who grew up behind the Iron Curtain, had developed a much more cynical view of the media than we in the West. They knew that they were lied to. As a consequence they maintained a mistrust of the media even after they had fled or migrated to the West. More and more people in the West, and especially conservatives, find themselves in the same situation.

Because many of us consume alternative media, we can see that the “mainstream media” lie more brazenly and blatantly than ever before.
But how did the people behind the Iron Curtain know that they were lied to? They had no alternative media. They had only the state media.
The answer is a very simple one. The lies of the propaganda media flew so blatantly in the face of reality that everyone could see them correctly as lies.
You see, the media can tell me all they want that I live in a system with a great standard of living. If I and all the people around me have to forage for food and to eat shoe leather just to barely survive, then no amount of propaganda can convince me that I enjoy a great standard of living.
The more the propaganda is in conflict with reality, the less effective it is and the less credibility those who spread it have.
THIS is the key to defeating propaganda.

What then should our tactic be for achieving our strategic goal of destroying the credibility of the “mainstream media”?
We should provoke the “mainstream media” into spreading lies. The more they lie, the more credibility they lose.
However, it is important that they spread the “right kind” of lies. It must be lies about things that can be easily verified by the population.
Example: If we hammer and hammer the social media / alternative media constantly with the theme of inflation and rising prices we might provoke the “mainstream media” and the “fact checkers” into claiming that there is no significant inflation.
That would be a victory. It doesn’t matter what your religion or your political world view is. Your wallet doesn’t lie.
If we can cause the “mainstream media” to spread lies that fly blatantly in the face of reality, we can significantly decrease their credibility and hence the effectiveness of their propaganda.
This tactic is the equivalent of provoking your enemy into attacking a strong, fortified position or into running into an ambush.
There is no guarantee that this tactic will work but given that most “journalists” live in a bubble, separated from the “average Joe”, there’s a good chance that it might work.

The outlined strategy is only one of many possible strategies such as infiltration (Project veritas) or a takeover of media outlets by buying them.
Politcal war follows the same priciples as any other kind of war and we should apply those principles to the fullest extent.
I understand that there might be objections on moral grounds but condemning future generations to live in tyranny and misery is the greater moral evil.
Fortunately, prior generations did not refuse to fight the wars that needed to be fought (US independence, fight against the Nazis/Axis powers).

Finally, when I had a discussion on Citzen Tom’s blog on the same topic he wrote:

“Negative campaigning works because the legacy news media repeats all those lies. The only way around this is to go to our neighbors and to ask them to doublecheck their assumptions about the truth of what they have been taught. The only way around this to is go to our neighbors and to ask them why they believe the big corporate news media, the same people who tell them to tax the rich, the rich who never seem to get taxed even when Democrats have a solid majority.”

Getting around the “mainstream media” by talking directly to our neighbours is an option that is always available to us and it it should be used whenever possible.

On The Road To Genocide

I’ve visited the Dachau concentration camp twice. First time as a boy, next time as a teenager. I’ve read books about the 3rd Reich. I’ve watched tons of videos and films dealing with the holocaust and world war II. In school we were taught about this dark era in German history. I’ve read books on racism, antisemitism and xenophobia. I’ve been living in this country for decades knowing the culture fairly well. And yet, and yet I could not really understand how a country that was one of the most scientifically, technologically and culturally advanced countries in the world could descend into murder, barbarism and insanity.

I could not really understand why people would so willingly give up their freedom, so easily accept being ruled by a dictatorship and so blindly follow irrational, idiotic and arbitrary rules until the wuhan virus happened. Fear and panic brought out the ugliest, most primitive sides of man.
Things prior unimaginable happened with a swiftness that took most by surprise, leaving many in disbelief about the very reality happening right in front of their eyes.
Those who kept a modicum of sanity, refusing to fear a virus not much more dangerous than a bad flu, were made to fear the state which, in authoritarian, dictatorial style, enforced irrational, idiotic and arbitrary rules.

I’m not the only one for whom the years 2020 and 2021 have been a revelation.
In his column “I Now Better Understand the ‘Good German’” Dennis Prager writes:

“One of the biggest revelations concerns a question that has always plagued me: How does one explain the “good German,” the term used to describe the average, presumably decent German, who did nothing to hurt Jews but also did nothing to help them and did nothing to undermine the Nazi regime? “

and

“What has changed my thinking has been watching what is happening in America (and Canada and Australia and elsewhere, for that matter).

The ease with which tens of millions of Americans have accepted irrational, unconstitutional and unprecedented police state-type restrictions on their freedoms, including even the freedom to make a living, has been, to understate the case, sobering.”

We have seen that events like the wuhan virus outbreak combined with media induced panic and constant disinformation can result in radical and swift change that was previously unthinkable.
Although events of that magnitude and consequence cannot by themselves cause anything, such events can function as a catalyst for radical change or other extreme events such as a genocide if the preconditions for that radical change or that other extreme event already exist.
The holocaust was not planned many decades in advance. Neither happened it out of thin air.

The preconditions for the holocaust were created many years before it happened.
Hatred of the Jews has existed for thousands of years.
Religiously justified hatred of Jews, called antijudaism, was horrible enough but Jews could at least escape persecution and death by converting to Christianity or Islam.

That changed whith Darwin’s theory of evolution which laid the foundation for modern racism.
No longer were all men created in God’s image but there were higher and lesser evolved races. Some races were even considered to be more animal than human. Evolution was the pseudoscientific base of modern racist theories including the nazi idea of the arian and the untermensch.

The most deadly aspect of antisemitism which made the holocaust possible was that Jews could no longer escape death and persecution by converting to another religion. You can’t change your race. Once the Jewish “race” was deemed a mortal thread to society the destruction of all Jews was the logical endpoint.
Widespread antisemitism based on race was the precondition. The circumstances leading to the 3rd Reich as well as Adolf Hitler were the catalyst and the spark that caused the powder keg to explode.

It saddens and infuriates me that, barely eighty years after the holocaust, the Left is advancing a theory that could potentially lead to another genocide.
It’s the same old poison, repackaged under a different name (Critical Race Theory or CRT), that contaminates the innocent minds of children, causing white kids to hate themselves and all the other kids to hate white persons.

If only Whites are racists and if all Whites are racists and if racism is such an evil then what is the logical endpoint if one wants to eliminate racism?
Exactly, it’s the elimination of all Whites.

Noel Ignatiev, a communist who developed the concept of “white privilege”, stated that he wanted to abolish the white race (see here and here).
He stated also that by “white race” he means the social construct called “white race”. Like those who advance CRT, he claimed that race was a social construct.
Whether that claim was a convenient smokescreen to hide his true motives and intentions (much like many antisemites claim to be just opposed to Israel’s policies) or whether he truly believed it, is beside the point.
The fact is, that many haters of Whites do not care about such nuances. You want evidence?
Just look at the deluge of anti-white hatred that floods the media and the social media these days.
Just listen to what comes out of the mouths of policians, activists, academics and prominent people.
If you said the things they say about Whites about any other group, you would be banned from polite society and lose your job and in some countries you would even go to jail.

Noel’s epigones can claim all they want that race is a social construct but in the end they themselves tie race to immutable, genetically determined, physical characteristics.
If a man is shot dead by the police, the radicals and their aplogists do not look at some abstract social construct. They look at he man’s skin color or physical characteristics.
If the dead dude has a white skin color then nobody cares and the media does not give a crap. If, however, the dead dude has a black skin color then the reaction is very different.
If teachers who peddle the racist garbage that is CRT, want children to check their “white privilege”, they are not selecting those kids based on some abstract social construct.
They are selecting those kids based on the very real physical characteristic of their white skin color. They are not asking kids with a black skin color to check their “white privilege”.

CRT is dangerous because it not only creates one necessary condition for genocide, the villification of a group of people, but it creates something much more dangerous and deadly. It makes it impossible for the members of the target group to ever escape by changing their religion, their ideology or their behaviour.
Just like the Jews could no longer escape persecution by converting to another religion, Whites won’t be able to escape potential future persecution and a potential future genocide by changing their behaviour.
As sure as the sun rises, CRT will cause hatred, violence and treatment of Whites as second class citizens, if it is allowed to spread.
From hatred, violence and treatment as second class citizens it is only a small step to genocide. All it takes are the right conditions and a catalyst.

I am encouraged by parents and especially mothers who boldly fight against CRT.
If there ever was a “hill to die on”, this is it. We must fight the racist CRT tooth and nail for the sake of future generations.