On The Road To Genocide

I’ve visited the Dachau concentration camp twice. First time as a boy, next time as a teenager. I’ve read books about the 3rd Reich. I’ve watched tons of videos and films dealing with the holocaust and world war II. In school we were taught about this dark era in German history. I’ve read books on racism, antisemitism and xenophobia. I’ve been living in this country for decades knowing the culture fairly well. And yet, and yet I could not really understand how a country that was one of the most scientifically, technologically and culturally advanced countries in the world could descend into murder, barbarism and insanity.

I could not really understand why people would so willingly give up their freedom, so easily accept being ruled by a dictatorship and so blindly follow irrational, idiotic and arbitrary rules until the wuhan virus happened. Fear and panic brought out the ugliest, most primitive sides of man.
Things prior unimaginable happened with a swiftness that took most by surprise, leaving many in disbelief about the very reality happening right in front of their eyes.
Those who kept a modicum of sanity, refusing to fear a virus not much more dangerous than a bad flu, were made to fear the state which, in authoritarian, dictatorial style, enforced irrational, idiotic and arbitrary rules.

I’m not the only one for whom the years 2020 and 2021 have been a revelation.
In his column “I Now Better Understand the ‘Good German’” Dennis Prager writes:

“One of the biggest revelations concerns a question that has always plagued me: How does one explain the “good German,” the term used to describe the average, presumably decent German, who did nothing to hurt Jews but also did nothing to help them and did nothing to undermine the Nazi regime? “


“What has changed my thinking has been watching what is happening in America (and Canada and Australia and elsewhere, for that matter).

The ease with which tens of millions of Americans have accepted irrational, unconstitutional and unprecedented police state-type restrictions on their freedoms, including even the freedom to make a living, has been, to understate the case, sobering.”

We have seen that events like the wuhan virus outbreak combined with media induced panic and constant disinformation can result in radical and swift change that was previously unthinkable.
Although events of that magnitude and consequence cannot by themselves cause anything, such events can function as a catalyst for radical change or other extreme events such as a genocide if the preconditions for that radical change or that other extreme event already exist.
The holocaust was not planned many decades in advance. Neither happened it out of thin air.

The preconditions for the holocaust were created many years before it happened.
Hatred of the Jews has existed for thousands of years.
Religiously justified hatred of Jews, called antijudaism, was horrible enough but Jews could at least escape persecution and death by converting to Christianity or Islam.

That changed whith Darwin’s theory of evolution which laid the foundation for modern racism.
No longer were all men created in God’s image but there were higher and lesser evolved races. Some races were even considered to be more animal than human. Evolution was the pseudoscientific base of modern racist theories including the nazi idea of the arian and the untermensch.

The most deadly aspect of antisemitism which made the holocaust possible was that Jews could no longer escape death and persecution by converting to another religion. You can’t change your race. Once the Jewish “race” was deemed a mortal thread to society the destruction of all Jews was the logical endpoint.
Widespread antisemitism based on race was the precondition. The circumstances leading to the 3rd Reich as well as Adolf Hitler were the catalyst and the spark that caused the powder keg to explode.

It saddens and infuriates me that, barely eighty years after the holocaust, the Left is advancing a theory that could potentially lead to another genocide.
It’s the same old poison, repackaged under a different name (Critical Race Theory or CRT), that contaminates the innocent minds of children, causing white kids to hate themselves and all the other kids to hate white persons.

If only Whites are racists and if all Whites are racists and if racism is such an evil then what is the logical endpoint if one wants to eliminate racism?
Exactly, it’s the elimination of all Whites.

Noel Ignatiev, a communist who developed the concept of “white privilege”, stated that he wanted to abolish the white race (see here and here).
He stated also that by “white race” he means the social construct called “white race”. Like those who advance CRT, he claimed that race was a social construct.
Whether that claim was a convenient smokescreen to hide his true motives and intentions (much like many antisemites claim to be just opposed to Israel’s policies) or whether he truly believed it, is beside the point.
The fact is, that many haters of Whites do not care about such nuances. You want evidence?
Just look at the deluge of anti-white hatred that floods the media and the social media these days.
Just listen to what comes out of the mouths of policians, activists, academics and prominent people.
If you said the things they say about Whites about any other group, you would be banned from polite society and lose your job and in some countries you would even go to jail.

Noel’s epigones can claim all they want that race is a social construct but in the end they themselves tie race to immutable, genetically determined, physical characteristics.
If a man is shot dead by the police, the radicals and their aplogists do not look at some abstract social construct. They look at he man’s skin color or physical characteristics.
If the dead dude has a white skin color then nobody cares and the media does not give a crap. If, however, the dead dude has a black skin color then the reaction is very different.
If teachers who peddle the racist garbage that is CRT, want children to check their “white privilege”, they are not selecting those kids based on some abstract social construct.
They are selecting those kids based on the very real physical characteristic of their white skin color. They are not asking kids with a black skin color to check their “white privilege”.

CRT is dangerous because it not only creates one necessary condition for genocide, the villification of a group of people, but it creates something much more dangerous and deadly. It makes it impossible for the members of the target group to ever escape by changing their religion, their ideology or their behaviour.
Just like the Jews could no longer escape persecution by converting to another religion, Whites won’t be able to escape potential future persecution and a potential future genocide by changing their behaviour.
As sure as the sun rises, CRT will cause hatred, violence and treatment of Whites as second class citizens, if it is allowed to spread.
From hatred, violence and treatment as second class citizens it is only a small step to genocide. All it takes are the right conditions and a catalyst.

I am encouraged by parents and especially mothers who boldly fight against CRT.
If there ever was a “hill to die on”, this is it. We must fight the racist CRT tooth and nail for the sake of future generations.

Batsoup Crazy Or Batman Villain?

The Fauci emails have confirmed what many of us knew or suspected all along.
Even before Nicholas Wade published his comprehensive article, for wihich he deserves great credit, there was enough circumstantial evidence that justified the assertion that the wuhan virus leaked from a lab in Wuhan.
Furthermore, there was ample evidence for the involvement of the US medical bureaucracy (NIH and NIAID) in Chinese gain of function experiments and other dangerous biological research.
The involvement of NIH and NIAID was mainly through funding of and cooperation with their Chinese counterparts.
Also, the substandard or nonexistent protocols and regulations in Chinese labs were common knowledge.

In 2015 “Nature” published a study by the infamous “Bat Lady” Dr. Shi and by Dr. Baric.
The study described how they changed a bat virus into a virus that could infect human airway cells. In the publication the authors state that their research was supported by grants from NIAID (Fauci’s organisation) and NIH.

In an interview with CBS former FDA commisioner Gottlieb said that lab leaks happen all the time and that the last six known outbreaks of SARS-1 in China were borne out of labs.

At a 2011 conference sponsored by NIH the director of the Wuhan lab almost bragged that there were practically no regulations when it comes to dual use research of concern (DURC). “Dual use” means that the research could be used both for military and civilian purposes and it includes gain of function experiments.

In an opinion piece from May 13, 2020 in “The Diplomat” the author discusses “Why Would the US Have Funded the Controversial Wuhan Lab?”

This comprehensive Newsweek article from April 27, 2020 already contains most of the information that we know today.

The real scandal is, that despite the fact that the medical bureaucracy, the scientific community and the media knew all these facts they all colluded together with big tech, China and the WHO in order to shut down any discussion of a lab leak as a potential origin of the wuhan virus.
Why did they do it?
China (the CCP) did not want to draw the fury of the world, law suits, demands for reparations, the damage to its image and very negative diplomatic and economic consequences followed by a loss of power or severe internal challenges to its power.
The US medical bureaucracy and the scientific community feared a loss of trust, credibility and funding as well as being put under the microscope and being heavily regulated.
The WTO was practically in the pockets of the CCP and was used to spread misinformation like the WTO statement that the virus was not transmissible to humans.
The CCP, the US medical bureaucracy, the media and big tech had one political enemy: Trump. A natural origin of the virus would shift all the burden to Trump and how he would deal with the emerging crisis. Thanks to a phenomenal US economy President Trump’s reelection was virtually assured. A real, severe crisis was a golden opportunity to ruin President Trump’s reelection prospects.
The media went even so far as to repeat CCP propaganda like the claim that the virus could be spread by people eating bat soup.

One question that plagued me is: How extensive was US involvement in the Chinese virus research? Was the US military also involved?
Very unlikely! Why would they outsource virus research that could be used by the enemy to produce bioweapons? To do that they would have to be completely insane or completely traitorous.
Why would US scientists and US institutions cooperate in such research? Well, isn’t the answer obvious? They did it for the same reasons that large parts of the world outsource a huge proportion of their industrial production to China.
Cheap labor and the fact that the Chinese communist party doesn’t give a crap about the environment, safety standards or the protection of the labour force does attract foreign manufacturers. While Western woke politicians and ecological totalitarians enforce in Western countries insane and unrealistic standards instead of reasonable regulations, manufacturers take their production to China where there are no standards at all. This, however, does not excuse scientists who wouldn’t accept even reasonable standards and who would know no ethical limits to their research. Some regulations and bans exist for a good reason. Also, letting do things by Chinese scientists gives some kind of “plausible deniability”. Put simply, they could do in China what they couldn’t do in the US.

Enter Anthony Fauci.
The first time I saw Dr. Fauci he struck me as likeable and funny but as time progressed, that first perception changed substantially.
I noticed that his words and actions were neither dictated by science nor by care for the health and the lives of millions of people.
Here is the progression of Faucis views (I paraphrase):
“The virus is no big deal. You can take that cruise on that ship.”
“The virus is very dangerous and deadly.”
“Asymptomatic spread is not the driver of the pandemic.”
Remember! The justification for both lockdowns and mask mandates is based on the assumption that the virus spreads asymptomatically.
“Masks do not work.”
“Wear masks!”
“Lockdowns were no mistake.”
At no point did Fauci justify the sudden and abrupt changes of his views with new scientific data.
Besides, it would seem strange that everything we know about viruses would change drastically in the short span of months. Indeed, the science has not changed as fast as Dr. Fauci’s opinions.
Neither is the wuhan virus so radically different from other corona viruses that we should throw everything we know about them out the window.
Rather than being dictated by science his changes were motivated by political and personal needs.
What disturbed me above all else was his pathological need for the limelight, the camera and the adoration of the media who portray him as a combination of a Hippocrates, a saint and a Marvel superhero.
I understand that a man who works in the relative anonymity of the bureaucratic machine, enjoys his bath in the spotlight, the fame and power that he gets suddenly at the last years of his career but his craving for adoration is clearly obsessive. This craving is what motivates him above all else. Something is not right with Dr. Fauci.
A secondary motivation for Fauci’s desire to be constantly present in the media is money. All those interviews, speeches and events bring some neat extra cash.
Last month alone yours truly received two “Meet Dr. Fauci” email invitations from the company yours truly works for. You can rest assured that the company payed Mr. Fauci a neat sum for these events.
As with all the other players, Fauci knew everything that they did and yet he was involved, albeit indirectly, with the research in the Wuhan lab. He knew that there were virtually no regulations for dual use research and if there were any they were sloppily implemented. He had to know. How else could he predict in 2017 that Trump would have to deal with a pandemic in his presidency? He knew that a leak would happen sooner or later and he knew exactly what kind of research was done in the Wuhan lab.
Why? Why? Why? Why did he do it? Is he the stereotypical “mad scientist” who sacrifices everything, including his soul, for science? No! He does not seem to care that much about the science. My guess is that his motivation was of a pecuniary nature and that a potential lab leak and the resulting pandemic were merely collateral damage. He may have made an even more sinister calculation. From his point of view a pandemic may be a great outcome allowing him to reap exactly the benefits he enjoys so much now. Viewed in this light a lab leak was not a bug. It was a feature.
You think I’m too harsh with Dr. Fauci? NO!
I KNOW that Fauci does not give an excrement about the human suffering that he caused and that he continues to cause.
How do I know?
He suggested lockdowns and masks as means to stop or slow the pandemic. There is no evidence that lockdowns or masks reduce the overall number of deaths of a pandemic. There is however evidence that lockdowns cause economic and psychological devastation and that they cause additional death and depression. There is evidence that the wearing of masks causes health damage and psychological damage.
A hippocratic principle is: Do no harm. You don’t apply a procedure to the patient if you know that it harms him but you don’t know whether that procedure does help him at all.
Worse, the same Dr. Fauci discouraged the use of Hydroxychlaraquin and Ivermectin claiming insufficient evidence for their efficacy while these drugs are safe and they have been in use for decades.
Had these drugs been used widely, thousands of lifes would have been saved. Because these drugs are safe, discouraging their use is completely irrational, even if their efficacy is not as great as one hopes for.
Again, Fauci never gave a rational justification for his recommendations. He was motivated not by science but by something different.
Fauci is not batsoup crazy. He is like one of those truly evil Batman villains who would blow up an entire city just to satisfy their sick, perverted needs.
He’s a sick, evil bastard who caused death by the hundreds of thousands and who made all our lives miserable. That’s the nicest thing I can say about him.