This speech is, I believe, a speech that will make history.
This is the first time ever I’ve heard an American politician explaining so clearly and comprehensively the war we’re in so bluntly and without mincing words.
But even more important, he lays out what needs to be done.
There are too many highlights to mention. The fireworks begin at 3:37.
Today I want to introduce my readers to an extremely efficient, revolutionary strategy that Japan has developed and employed in order to defeat terrrorism.
Indeed, this strategy is so successful that the world can only watch in awe.
This strategy has the advantage of beeing very cheap and of having a success rate of 99.999 %.
It is so sophisticated and yet at the same time so simple that the rest of the world asks in great amazement “Why didn’t we ourselves figured that out? It’s so simple. It’s pure genious.”.
Enough of the introduction. Are you ready?
Here’s how Japan defeated terrorism: There are virtually no muslims in Japan.
As bad as the terror attacks in France were they were only a taste of what is going to come.
For years I have felt that we are in a war that most people around me simple chose to ignore or didn’t even know about.
Worse, those who should know better, our media and our ‘leaders’ not only chose to ignore it but they deliberately deceived us.
For years there has been something going on which can only be described as low intensity jihad.
Wherever there are greater concentrations of muslims there has been an increased level of violence against the native population and even against other foreigners who happened to have a different religion.
But in recent years it’s gotten much worse. Open discrimination, violence and persecution of non-muslims in schools and in the public place by muslims. Increased level of rapes. Honour killings.
Even though it’s not as bad as in France here in Germany there are areas that are less safe for non-muslims. These areas clearly are going to become no-go-zones in the coming years.
These areas are becoming states within the state where muslims chose to live segregated from the rest of society. It’s not because the host society doesn’t want them. It’s because they don’t want the host society.
It’s only a matter of time that the state won’t be able to enforce the law there and that they will govern themselves under their own law (most likely some form of sharia).
Why do I believe that it’s going to get worse?
Well, there are several reasons.
Al Qaeda’s seven step plan (published in 2005) expects a period of “total confrontation” after the establishment of an islamic state.
So far their plan has played out with amazing accuracy. For instance, this plan foresaw the establihment of an islamic state in the years 2013 to 2016.
You can read more about it here.
Next there is the history of jihad and islam which since the time of Muhammad expanded through violence and has waged constant war against the world ever since.
This jihad never ceased but it came only to a temporary halt because the West went through the Rennaisance and the industrial revolution which resulted in a economic and military superiority of the West.
After Muhammad’s death islam expanded into large parts of North Africa, Egypt, almost all of Spain, all of the Middle East and Persia, and parts of Asia Minor.
This violent expansion happened in just about 120 years and swept like a hurricane over Christian lands in Egypt and the Middle East.
Not only were many of those people killed, violently subjugated and taxed heavily through a special tax for infidels (jiziya tax) but the ancient classical world lost its bread basket Egypt and its intellectual center Syria.
Though the islamic expansion into the west of Europe was stopped at the Battle of Tours in 732 AD the muslims continued to attack merchant ships and raided the coasts of the Mediterranean Sea thus making sea trade increasingly difficult.
When the Byzantine Empire fell in 1453 the trade via the Silk Road to India and China was cut.
This was the reason why Christopher Columbus sailed to the west in search for new sea routes to India.
The Islamic expansion in the Mediterranean was stopped at the siege of Malta in 1565 and at the battle of Lepanto in 1571 but the expansion of islam through war continued relentlessly.
The Ottomans who saw themselves as warriors for islam waged constant war, conquering Greece and the Balkans and they were constantly expanding until the huge Ottoman army was stopped at the gates of Vienna at the now famous battle in 1683.
For now the islamic expansion was stopped but the jihad didn’t stop. Islamic pirates continued to attack ships along the coasts of the Mediterranean.
While the West made constant progress in society, science, medicine, industry, economy, arts and military technology and military tactics the islamic world stagnated.
The United States of America was hardly born as a Nation when it came under attack by the muslims.
US merchant ships were attacked and their crews sold as slaves. To avoid US ships from being attacked the US had to pay money to the islamic pirates.
At one point it got so bad that the federal goverment hat to pay 20% of its budget to the pirates.
Those pirates were not mere pirates or economic terrorists but jihadis.
Thomas Jefferson, then ambassador in France, recounts his talk with Tripoli’s ambassador.
“The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman [Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
After the first and second Barbary war (1805 and 1815) and after the Europeans followed the American example the pirates were decimated and the piracy ended.
An echo of these wars lives on in the hymn of the US Marines: “From the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli …”.
To the extend that the West became stronger the Ottoman empire became weaker until it became known as the “sick man of the Bosporus”.
European Countries that were conquered by the Ottomans were at last able to free themselves from the Ottoman yoke with the help of the big European powers.
The Ottoman Caliphate was finally abolished in 1924 and Turkey tried to become a secular country modeled after the European countries.
As we can see from history islam’s attack against the West was relentless and ended only after the West became strong enough to defeat islam militarily.
But while jihad against the West stopped for a brief time it continued elsewhere unabated.
Now, some may say “That’s history. That was long ago. We moved on and are now in the 21. century.”.
Right, we moved on and enjoyed, thanks to the sacrifices of our American friends and thanks to America’s power, a period of unprecedented global stability and peace in Europe and in the Pacific.
This period is despite the regional wars that happened since 1945 unparalleled in human history. Never have lived so many people for such a long time in peace and safety.
In fact, we’ve got so used to it that many of us have forgotten that this is the exception rather than the norm. In the course of history war rather than peace was the normal state of the world.
But I digress.
Many make the cardinal mistake of assuming that because we in the West have moved on the rest of the world has moved on as well.
Many simply project our way of thinking onto other people and cultures and believe that they essentially think the same way and want the same things we want.
Because we live in such a secularized society many of us fail to understand the important role of religion in the lives of people from other cultures.
For some cultures religion is dead serious business.
Many are too afraid to look reality in the face and indulge themeselves in wishful thinking. They see what they want to see.
So, let’s stare right into the face of reality.
Is there any muslim country in the world where non-muslims have fully equal rights to muslims? NO!
Is there any muslim country in the world where there are guaranteed individual freedoms (especially freedom of speech) equal to those in the West? NO!
If muslims all over the world cannot live with non-muslims as equals why the hell should they do so in the West? They can’t.
If muslims all over the world cannot establish or guarantee the freedoms we so value why the hell should they do so in the West? They can’t.
They can’t because islam does not allow them to grant equal rights to non-muslims and neither does islam allow the freedoms we take for granted.
Islamic doctrine demands that the muslims make islam superior to all other religions and that shariah is established as the supreme law of the land.
If islam shows the same results everywhere else in the world why should it show different results in the West?
Trying something that has failed everytime is insane. It’s especially insane if that something could kill and enslave you.
Of course, muslims can show that I’m wrong by establishing those rights and freedoms in at least one muslim country for an extended period of time (say two generations).
As we can see muslims cannot live as equals when they have a majority and neither can they allow the freedoms which we love in the West.
This brings me to demographics.
If demographic trends in the West continue we can expect the growth of a population that is not willing to grant non-muslims equal rights and cannot allow certain freedoms.
This population will become a majority in the future if trends are not reversed.
One could simply reverse the trend by allowing a large number of non-muslims who tend to have as much kids as the muslims into Europe while stopping muslim immigration to Europe.
For example Europe should take all the persecuted non-muslims from muslim countries in. That would be not only an act of selfpreservation but a moral act.
Anyway, as the muslim population grows, so increases its demands and its violence.
One could argue that as time goes by the muslims integrate into the Western society and that they become good Western citizens but the reality is that this is not the case.
Our multiculturalist bozos made shure that their own experiment fails by not demanding that the muslims integrate, by bending over backwards to their demands and by allowing them to live in their own parallel societies with their own laws.
So, we have an increasing muslim population, not willing to integrate, with ever increasing demands and with an unkinown percentage of radicals and deadly terrorists growing proportionally to its size.
That in itself makes shure that the War will intensify in the long run but there is a reason why the War will get more ugly in the more immediate future.
As the life of Muhammad shows (documented in the sirat and hadith) and as Islam’s history shows jihad always progresses in 3 stages.
Stage 1: Muslim population is very weak and small. Stealth jihad (claiming victim status, achieving special rights and priveleges, preaching tolerance while constantly subverting)
Stage 2: Muslim population has grown significantly in size and is strong enough to wage Defensive jihad (violence against oppression and attacks. Constant terrorist acts to weaken and intimidate the unbelievers).
In islamic dogma oppression and attacks are very broadly defined. Insulting Muhammad is clearly such an attack. Muhammad himself ordered the killing of a person who made fun of him.
Simply not giving in to muslim demands is oppression.
Stage 3: Muslim population is a majority or strong enough to subjugate the non-muslims Offensive jihad (full scale war to subjugate the non-believers)
In theory muslims could simply wait until they are a massive majority and then change the laws through the parlamentary and legal process but that won’t happen for the simple reason that whenever muslims are strong enough to wage jihad they are obliged to do it and also because there is no way in hell that we’re going to give up our freedoms and our rights voluntarily by allowing to become a minority in our own lands. As I’ve mentioned earlier that could be achieved by perfectly legal and democratic means.
“Jihad is an Individual duty and is also a sufficiency duty, for each and every Muslim. Anyone who does not participate is considered a hypocrite. There is no place for peaceful Muslims when Jihad becomes compulsory.”
That islam cannot peacefully coexist is also made perfectly clear by WikiIslam:
“The duty of the jihad exists as long as the universal domination of Islam has not been attained. Peace with non-Muslim nations is, therefore, a provisional state of affairs only; the chance of circumstances alone can justify it temporarily. Furthermore there can be no question of genuine peace treaties with these nations; only truces, whose duration ought not, in principle, to exceed ten years, are authorized. But even such truces are precarious, inasmuch as they can, before they expire, be repudiated unilaterally should it appear more profitable for Islam to resume the conflict.”
Britain, France and the Netherlands are clearly in Stage 2 of jihad.
The West’s weak response to the Islamic State has clearly encouraged the jihadis and gives them reason to intensify their attacks.
More succesful attacks in the West means also that they will get more followers in Iraq and Syria.
The increasing number and scale of the attacks will result in a massive popularity of parties such as UKIP, Front National, Geert Wilders’ party and movements such as PEGIDA.
If the established parties do not act they will lose power. With every successful terror attack the parties which created conditions (willingly or unwillingly) that made such attacks possible will lose power unless they act.
One final point.
Those who believe that by giving in to the demands of the muslims we will have peace with the terrorists are sadly mistaken.
Every concession is seen as weakness and is an incentive for more violence.
This will only stop if we don’t give in and finally fight back hard, eliminating the threat in our midst.
Are we not told that diversity is such a wonderful, benefcial thing?
Are we not told that diversity makes a country stronger and richer?
Well, those claims might or might not be true but the absolutely sick insanity of those who promote it boggles the mind.
More specifically, I find it absolutely insane that the proponents of multiculturalism in France are willing to allow the islamification of France knowing that islamic antisemitism is already a serious problem there and it’s going to get much worse with every increase in the muslim population.
The year 2014 was a very bad year for Jews in France and according to Tablet Magazine 7000 Jews left France for Israel.
That’s more than twice as much as in the year 2013.
Nearly 75% of French Jews are considering emigration.
In the aftermath of the islamic terrorist attacks in France the French PM Valls said: “If 100,000 Jews leave, France will no longer be France”.
Well, if current trends hold, that would be the case in about 14 years.
So, let me get this straight: in the name of diversity those ‘multuculturalists’ are allowing France to become judenrein, meaning without any Jews, thus making France less diverse.
That’s absolute insanity.
Michael Savage is right: Liberalism is a mental disorder.
I’m outraged by the Paris attacks by those islamic lowlife barbarians but I was not in the least surprised when it happened.
No, I’m neither a prophet nor do I have some intelligence sources.
Anyone with the slightest clue of 1400 years of islamic history and the slightest clue of islam could see that coming. In fact I’ve been expecting for some months an attack on Europe for the simple reason that the Islamic State has established a caliphate which is stable enough that it is going to stay and because it’s in the nature of the islamic caliphate that it wages jihad as soon as it has sufficient strength and because the West’s weak response to the Islamic State clearly has encouraged them.
This reasoning is clearly confirmed by an article published in the year 2005 by Spiegel Online, Germany’s biggest news magazine.
They quote a seven step plan from a book written by the Jordanian journalist Fouad Hussein who interviewed and spoke extensively with Al Qaeda leaders.
You can read the full article here.
Again, keep in mind that this article was published in 2005, which makes it almost prophetic because it plans for “the collapse of the hated Arabic governments” in the years 2010 to 2013 and the declaration of an islamic state or caliphate in 2013 to 2016.
What happened in 2010? Yep, the “Arab spring”.
What happened in 2014? Yep, the islamic state was declared.
Everything is going according to plan.
What is the plan after the caliphate is established? “Total confrontation”!
So, expect things in Europe to get worse, much worse.
One last thing. If you think the Islamic State and Al Qaeda are two different entities, think again.
They are not. The islamic state and Al Qaeda are one and the same.
The terrorists said they were from Al Qaeda Yemen whle the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the attacks.
So, here is their plan. Read it and don’t be surprised anymore.
The First Phase Known as “the awakening” — this has already been carried out and was supposed to have lasted from 2000 to 2003, or more precisely from the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 in New York and Washington to the fall of Baghdad in 2003. The aim of the attacks of 9/11 was to provoke the US into declaring war on the Islamic world and thereby “awakening” Muslims. “The first phase was judged by the strategists and masterminds behind al-Qaida as very successful,” writes Hussein. “The battle field was opened up and the Americans and their allies became a closer and easier target.” The terrorist network is also reported as being satisfied that its message can now be heard “everywhere.”
The Second Phase “Opening Eyes” is, according to Hussein’s definition, the period we are now in and should last until 2006. Hussein says the terrorists hope to make the western conspiracy aware of the “Islamic community.” Hussein believes this is a phase in which al-Qaida wants an organization to develop into a movement. The network is banking on recruiting young men during this period. Iraq should become the center for all global operations, with an “army” set up there and bases established in other Arabic states.
The Third Phase This is described as “Arising and Standing Up” and should last from 2007 to 2010. “There will be a focus on Syria,” prophesies Hussein, based on what his sources told him. The fighting cadres are supposedly already prepared and some are in Iraq. Attacks on Turkey and — even more explosive — in Israel are predicted. Al-Qaida’s masterminds hope that attacks on Israel will help the terrorist group become a recognized organization. The author also believes that countries neighboring Iraq, such as Jordan, are also in danger.
The Fourth Phase Between 2010 and 2013, Hussein writes that al-Qaida will aim to bring about the collapse of the hated Arabic governments. The estimate is that “the creeping loss of the regimes’ power will lead to a steady growth in strength within al-Qaida.” At the same time attacks will be carried out against oil suppliers and the US economy will be targeted using cyber terrorism.
The Fifth Phase This will be the point at which an Islamic state, or caliphate, can be declared. The plan is that by this time, between 2013 and 2016, Western influence in the Islamic world will be so reduced and Israel weakened so much, that resistance will not be feared. Al-Qaida hopes that by then the Islamic state will be able to bring about a new world order.
The Sixth Phase Hussein believes that from 2016 onwards there will a period of “total confrontation.” As soon as the caliphate has been declared the “Islamic army” it will instigate the “fight between the believers and the non-believers” which has so often been predicted by Osama bin Laden.
The Seventh Phase This final stage is described as “definitive victory.” Hussein writes that in the terrorists’ eyes, because the rest of the world will be so beaten down by the “one-and-a-half billion Muslims,” the caliphate will undoubtedly succeed. This phase should be completed by 2020, although the war shouldn’t last longer than two years.
Yesterday employees of the French magazine Charlie Hebdo have been murdered by islamic terrorists.
To the families of the murdered men who were killed:
May God give you comfort and guide you in this painful hour.
May He give you strength and courage.
I cannot offer you anything but my deepest gratitude and respect for what your loved ones did.
They were heros because they fought for something much greater than themselves. They fought for freedom, the greatest, most inspiring of all ideas.
They knew that their lives were in danger and yet they continued their good work.
In so doing they stood up for the freedom to express ourselves.
They fought not only for me, a complete stranger, but also for you.
Jesus said: “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.”
That’s how great their love for you was.
I know that they have not died in vain but they inspire us to stand up for what is good. They will raise more of us than they ever were.
Their memory will live on forever. Their memory will never die.
To the FILTHY, COWARDLY BASTARDS who killed those brave men:
We know who you are and we know what you are.
You are of slaves of evil. You are the slaves of a sick, perverted, evil man who called himself a prophet.
Your Muhammad was never a prophet. He never proved that he was a prophet. He was a sick evil man who enslaved FILTHY, COWARDLY BASTARDS and made them kill for him and his personal gain.
If he was a mere man and not a god why did he have 8, 9 or even more wifes while you can only have four?
He never was a prophet because no true prophet of God would break God’s laws and make up extra laws for himself.
You will never win because the more of us you kill the more of us wake up and arise until you will be swept away by a flood that no one can stop.
WE WILL NEVER GIVE IN! WE WILL NEVER SURRENDER OUR FREEDOM! WE WILL PREVAIL!
If it ain’t broke, screw it up.
Progressives love to take things or systems that work and screw them up, supposedly to make them better (because nothing is perfect) or supposedly to achieve some grand ideals.
Inevitably these things are screwed up. Why? Because they didn’t want to make them better in the first place and neither was the goal some grand ideal in the first place but rather some goal that is never stated openly because most people would not agree with the goal if it were to be openly declared.
When they’ve screwed something up by radically changing it they never go back to the original state of affairs since that would be, well, not progressive.
They are offering ‘solutions’ for the problems they’ve created insisting on staying the course they’ve taken and so those ‘solutions, based on something that is fundamentally flawed, will inevitable fail.
Not only that but the ‘solutions’ they offer are, again, not aimed at fixing the problem but at achieving some unstated goal.
These cycle is repeated until either the madness is stopped or the Progressive’s unstated aim is achieved.
That’s why the “health care reform” screwed the health care system up.
That’s why this “reform” doesn’t achieve its stated aims.
That’s why it was not some great blunder brought by incredible incompetence.
Those who push such agendas through are not bothered by the horrible side effects of their “reforms” as long as their unstated goals are furthered.